When the Internet Stops Inspiring Travel
“The
real voyage of discovery consists, not in seeking new landscapes, but in having
new eyes.”
Marcel Proust, La
Prisonnière / In Search of Lost Time
Accidental Discoveries
We
discovered it by accident.
One
evening, almost absent-mindedly, we searched for a place we had written about
years earlier. It was not anywhere famous, not one of those places that fill
travel magazines or dominate social media feeds. It was a quieter stretch of
trail, the kind of place that had stayed with us because we had walked there,
spent a night there, and enjoyed a good meal there. We remembered the weather, the light, the
birds, and the landscape. It was one of those moments that is impossible to
summarize but which we enjoyed time and again on the Trans Canada Trail.
Then
something odd appeared in the search results.
Our
photograph.
But
it was not on our website.
It
was not even on a site we recognized.
Curious,
we clicked. Then we found another. And another. And another.
By the time we
finished searching hours later, our photographs and fragments of our stories
had appeared on more than thirty-five different websites. Some had taken
the images directly. Others had lifted phrases, route descriptions, daily
details, and even our experiences. Many presented the material as if the
journey had happened to no one in particular, as if the places, the birds, the
mistakes, and the experiences had simply appeared online, ownerless and ready
to be repackaged. A few presented it as their own journey and their own
achievement.
That
was the moment we began to realize something about the internet had changed.
For
years, we shared our travels online with a simple hope: that our stories and
photographs might encourage someone else to step outside and experience the
world for themselves. We wrote about the virtue of taking long hikes, wandering through forests, and exploring small towns across Canada. We wrote about difficult days, unexpected
acts of kindness and those moments on a journey that suddenly become more
meaningful than we could ever have expected. Often in these moments it some odd
detail or encounter or mistake that somehow became the thing we most
remembered. Sometimes it is the oddest
and smallest details that still stand out even years later.
Amid
it all, the goal was never to provide perfect answers. It was to capture
something of the feeling of being out there - to tell a story that might
encourage someone else to go see the world for themselves.
For
a long time, that felt like what the internet was for – to educate, to inform,
and to inspire.
When
we began our #Hike4Birds across Canada
on the Trans Canada Trail, we were not trying to create a definitive guide.
We were walking, photographing, birding, and writing our way across a country
that could not possibly be reduced to a single line on a map or understood in
a simple way.
Newfoundland
began at Cape Spear and moved through coastal footpaths, the T’Railway,
puffins, whales, icebergs, caribou, and the wonder of taking those first steps
westward. Prince Edward Island offered a very different feel on the
Confederation Trail, red beaches, lighthouses, shelters, Charlottetown, and
island hospitality. Saskatchewan, which so many people casually imagine as
flat, surprised us with ferries, sand dunes, the Qu’Appelle Valley, the Trails
of 1885, Snow Geese, and landscapes that were anything but simple.
Every
province complicated our expectations. Every section reminded us that a journey
is not the same as an itinerary or simply understood. We tried to show these
complexities – the good and the bad, the wonderful and the challenging. We shared it all and our photographs online
to inspire.
The World Matters Beyond the Search Result
But
lately, I have begun to realize that the philosophy of the internet is changing.
Increasingly,
online writing is being shaped not for human curiosity but for algorithms,
artificial intelligence, search engines, and attention spans that are ever more
fleeting. Articles are structured to answer questions quickly and efficiently.
Bullet points. FAQs. Short paragraphs. Repeated headings. Clean answers. Simple
takeaways. Everything is designed to be scanned, summarized, extracted, and fed
back into another system.
I
understand why this is happening. People want fast answers, and technology is
evolving to deliver them. There is nothing wrong with wanting to know where a
trail begins, whether a route is safe, how long a section might take, or what
kind of terrain to expect. Practical information matters. On a long-distance
journey, it can matter very much.
But
something important is getting lost in the process.
If
only because life, the world, and travel often cannot be presented or
understood as a set of simplified answers.
The
experiences that stay with us are usually the ones we did not expect. The trail
we almost did not take. The wrong turn that led to somewhere beautiful. The person
who stopped to ask whether we needed help. The storm we watched rolling across
the prairies. The tiny town that offered more kindness than any famous
destination. The day that looked ordinary in the morning and became
unforgettable by evening.
Those
moments do not fit neatly into lists or search queries. They are not always useful
in the way the internet now defines usefulness. They do not always answer “what
is the best,” “how do I,” “can you,” or “should I.” They cannot be reduced to
FAQs and listicals. Often, they do
something more important. They ask us to pay attention – because if we don’t, we
miss out on the opportunity to see so much more of the world.
Across
the Trans Canada Trail, that was the lesson we kept learning. The trail was
never one thing. It was a coastal footpath, a rail trail, the shoulder of a road, a city
pathway, a prairie concession, a forest track, a ferry crossing, a mountain route, a highway edge, a waterway, a detour, and sometimes a gap that had to be solved with
patience and humility. Ontario alone became a vast, almost bewildering
patchwork of pathways, roadways, waterways, urban trails, Canadian Shield,
Great Lakes shoreline, northern roads, the Sudbury Camino, the Casque Isles
Trail, and Sleeping Giant Provincial Park.
No
quick answer could explain that. No
summary could make it simple without making it false.
What happens when Stories become Substitutes for Experience
At
the same time, another change is happening behind the scenes. Stories,
photographs, and personal experiences shared online are now being absorbed into
enormous systems of reuse. Some of this happens through artificial
intelligence. Some of it happens through scraping. Some of it happens through
websites that exist largely to gather other people’s work, rearrange it, and
publish it again in a more generic form – all generalized, all simplified.
The
result is that travel content is increasingly detached from the people who
actually lived it, and stories as related by AI and Google Search results are
becoming substitutes for lived
experience.
Photos
appear on websites we have never heard of. Stories are summarized and
repackaged across dozens of platforms. Experiences that once belonged to a
specific place and moment are flattened into generic answers to generic
questions. Sometimes our own photographs appear on websites that seem to claim
them as their own. Sometimes our stories are retold without context, as if they
happened to someone else entirely. Sometimes a complicated journey becomes a
tidy guide. Sometimes years of walking are compressed into a few confident
paragraphs by someone, or something, that was never there.
It
creates a strange feeling: watching real experiences slowly dissolve into
anonymous content or being claimed as another’s journey. This is not really about credit alone,
although credit matters. It is not only about ownership, although authorship
matters too. The internet has always been a place where ideas circulate,
evolve, and inspire other ideas. We have never objected to people being
inspired by our work. In fact, that was the point. We wanted people to see a
trail, a bird, a landscape, or a quiet stretch of Canada and think: maybe I
could go there too, maybe if they can do that, I can go further.
What
feels different now is that the stories themselves are becoming substitutes for
the experiences they were meant to inspire.
Instead
of reading a story and feeling the urge to explore, the system increasingly
encourages something else: stay where you are, ask another question, scroll a
little further, let the summary stand in for the world.
In
some ways, it makes sense. If technology can provide a quick answer to any
question about any destination, why bother going there yourself? Why get muddy?
Why be uncertain? Why stand in the rain beside a confusing trail junction? Why
misjudge the distance between towns? Why learn, slowly and sometimes
uncomfortably, that the world is more complicated than the plan?
But
travel was never about simple answers.
Role of Travel, Importance of Lived Experiences
Travel
is about uncertainty. It is about the moment when the map stops being helpful, and curiosity has to take over. It is about stepping into a place you have
never been and discovering that reality is always more complex than any
description. It is about challenging your assumptions, discovering new
perspectives and going on to ask better questions.
The
internet can tell you that Manitoba contains prairie, boreal forest, extreme
heat, rail trails, and the Crow Wing
route. But it cannot tell you what it felt like to walk out of Whiteshell
Park, into the flat opening of the prairie, under a hard sun, with little water
and a horizon that seemed to keep moving away from you. It can list trails and
towns and provide fixed distances, but it cannot reproduce the accumulation of
feeling that came from walking from South Whiteshell to Pinawa, to Winnipeg, along
the Crow Wing Trail, and turn north following beside the Rossburn Subdivision
Trail, and the Crocus Trail as the landscape gradually changed beneath our
feet.
It
can tell you British Columbia has mountains, trestles, tunnels, the Kettle Valley Rail Trail, the Fraser
River, Vancouver, Vancouver Island, and the western terminus at Clover Point.
But it cannot stand with you in the cold and see fresh snow on the peaks, or understand
that the landscape has changed overnight. It cannot know the mixture of relief
and exhaustion that comes from reaching the Pacific after years of walking
west.
It
can tell you Alberta stretches from the Iron
Horse Rail Trail and ranch country to Edmonton, Calgary, the Rocky Mountain
Legacy Trail, the High Rockies Trail, and Elk Pass. But it cannot feel the
shift from open prairie to foothills to mountains in the mind. It cannot
understand how a route that looks clear on a map can become a series of
decisions about weather, traffic, fatigue, danger, and whether continuing on is
worth the risk.
That
is what worries me about this new version of the internet. Not that it gives
people information. Information is useful. Not that it summarizes. Summaries
have their place. But that it can make the world feel already known and
simplify everything down so much that it has no meaning and no relationship to
the real world.
And
a world that feels already known is a world people may stop entering with
curiosity.
A
trail becomes content. A town becomes a listicle. A bird becomes a stock image.
A lifetime memory becomes an FAQ for AI to read. A journey becomes something
consumed rather than something lived.
The Complexity and Beauty of the World
Yet
the world remains exactly as it has always been: beautiful, unpredictable, and
far too complex to fit into a list of bullet points.
The
best parts of travel are often inefficient. They take time. They require attention.
They refuse to be optimized. You cannot summarize your way into the feeling of
walking into a new province. You cannot Google your way into the kindness of
strangers. You cannot search-result your way into the humility that comes from
being wrong about a place or knowing you have pushed too far. You cannot generate
the particular silence of an empty road in the Arctic at night, the smell of
wet forest after rain, the sound of Snow Geese filling the sky, or the feeling
of finally reaching an ocean you have been walking toward for years.
No
algorithm can replicate that. No summary
can capture the feeling of standing somewhere for the first time or seeing
something unexpected.
Stories
matter because they are not only containers for information. They are
invitations. They ask us to slow down long enough to imagine the world as
something alive, layered, and unfinished. At their best, they do not close
curiosity down. They open it.
That
is why all of this matters beyond our own photographs, our own blogs, or our
own frustration. If travel writing becomes only a source of extracted answers,
then we lose the very thing that made it worth reading in the first place. We
lose the hesitation, the contradiction, the weather, the confusion, the
tenderness, the long approach, the partial understanding, and the sense that
the world is always larger than what we know how to say about it.
The
internet will continue to change. Of course it will. Search engines will
change. Artificial intelligence will change and evolve. The ways people find,
read, and reuse stories and information will likewise adapt and change.
The
real question is whether storytelling will still have a place within a world
increasingly shaped by digital content.
Perhaps the task now is not to write for the machine,
but to keep writing past it. To keep telling stories slowly enough that they
resist being flattened. To keep placing names, weather, birds, roads, mistakes,
kindness, and uncertainty back into the frame. To remember that the purpose of
sharing a journey is not to replace the journey for someone else, but to remind
them that the world is still there, waiting beyond the screen.
Because
stories do something that algorithms cannot.
They remind us that the world is not something to be summarized. It is
something to be entered, something to be experienced, something to be lived in.
See
you on the trail.


Comments
Post a Comment